Download Books/Pdf

Peer Review Policy

Peer – review process is double blind meaning that the author does not know the identity of the reviewer and same with the reviewer.

At least two review reports are collected for each submitted article. Suggestions of reviewers can be made by the academic editor during pre-check.

The following checks are applied to all reviewers:

• That they hold a PhD (exceptions are made in some fields, e.g. medicine);
• They must have recent publications in the field of the submitted paper;

Reviewers are given two weeks to write their review. For the review of a revised manuscript, reviewers are asked to provide their report within three days. In both cases, extensions can be granted on request. A paper can only be accepted for publication by an academic editor.

Policy of submission and/or publication

The publication process is consisting with the following steps. The ultimate objectives of this process are quality. Full process will be completed expected within 3-5 days.

1. After Receiving The Manuscript We Will Send A Submission Of Acknowledgement E-Mail to The Author.
2. Manuscripts Will Be Checked for Plagiarism.
3. Primary Quality Will Be Checked By The Editor
4. The Manuscript Will Be Sent For Double Blinded Review.
5. Based On The Double Blinded Review Editor Will Take Decision And The Decision Will Be Communicated To The Author. Decisions Can Be Three Types Like Accepted Without Revision, Resubmit With Major/Minor Revisions, Rejected.

After The Final Review Process If The Paper Will Accepted We Will Send for Publication.